Noticeable halation. Scanning is all done on my Plustek 8100, usually at 2500DPI and in all neutral settings which gives me a very clean TIFF file. Although I wouldnt The Kentmere is the real all rounder. Both are unique and can not replace the other. Everything is personal preference, just Glad you found it useful! notfalls kann man es in 1+100 mit einer Standentwicklung versuchen. It provides a grittier look than other Kodak films (specifically T-Max 400). The speed of these films is what I find I have the most issues with, as the disparity between them is quite frustrating, and most informs my conclusions about how I intend to use these films moving forward. I like the compositions of your sample images a lot. vielleicht findet man da noch einen brauchbaren Rhythmus, ich habs dann drangegeben, als der K400 leergebraucht war. JavaScript is disabled. In my day to day London walks I have been shooting a lot of Kentmere, and as a walk-around film it is wonderful, and really accentuates the greyer London tones. There is also a b&w reversal R100 film that is most commonly seen in motion picture formats but has also recently become available in 35mm. Black and rich and whites are vivid. When shot with different exposures in mind, in different kinds of conditions, these films can produce quite a few looks. I think the character of these films are the elements that remain consistent through most use cases. Re: Fomapan 100, 200 and 400. You can see the loss of highlight at the top of the frame, but there are more shades of grey that are maintained. Both films are a solid choice - try both and see which you like better! You cant throw any developer at Fomapan 400 and expect pleasing results. The images made with that extra stop of light were enough to allow me to settle for [], [] The images above all felt under exposed. I disagree that Fomapan 400 is garbage, but it is very different to HP5+. I no longer have to cross my fingers hoping that the negatives will come out. Update: December 30, 2020While keeping the original pricing at the time of writing in-place, added prices as of December 2020. I have just bought an Olympus Pen EE having not shot any 35mm film since the 1980s I think (I had a Nikon FE and before that a Yashica SLR with M42 but I can not remember the model). A couple of years ago, I spent the summer shooting different B&W films. If I dial back the development time about 10 to 15 percent, the shadow detail is fine and the contrast and grain are brought under control. And I thought taping over the red dot was silly. Id say that Fomapan 400 is fairly low grain, but largegrained very visible, but not bad to my eye. The contrast of a Fomapan 400 is going very high at higher iso rates. The images more often than not remind of me Tri-X at box speed that prevailing grey-tone is distinct. und deshalb folge ich da den Herstellerangaben der Chemie. I found you had to be more accurate with exposure (i.e. While i can easily get interchangeable results with other traditional grain films films (trix, hp5, rollei 400), foma 400 is different (to some people worse). November 20, 2019. Especially considering the cost Id be happy to shoot this when the light calls for it, and keep my standard Delta and HP5 for the less than ideal autumn and winer light. There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! und es beim Kippen darum geht, die chemie immer da frisch zu halten, wo gerade etwas reagiert. I personally have a love/hate relationship with Tri-X because no matter what I do, the grain is always hit or miss when scanning. I quit shooting Fomapan 400 because it was so scratch prone for me.Also, whats your Plustek workflow like Im thinking of ditching silverfast for vuescan, Im hearing vuescan makes for more neutral images because silverfast always wants to employ negafix profiles and rubbish like that (half the films I shoot dont even have a negafix profile). Unless I pre-soak and rinse the film before the developer, I do so thoroughly after dumping-off the developer to ensure that none of the vivid green anti-halation dye remains to avoid polluting my stop both with it; with that level of rinse, the stop is probably redundant, but I do it anyway. I'm open to any dispute. FrancoCJanuary 9, 2015 in Analog-Forum, Hallo, eine neue Bestellung von Filmen steht mal wieder an. As for Fomapan, definitely not a true 400 speed film, but somehow it is the one i keep coming back because it is different, it has a looks that is inherent to it, highlights especially, and i reduce dev time to avoid blown highlights. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. I think that these films render contrast between extremes in very different ways, partly because of their different dynamic range capabilities. Some great shots here, but the man smoking in the bus is just terrific. Thanks to the compensating nature of TMax and Acufine and using a highly dilute (1+63) mix of Ilfotec HC. It has a unique feel and look. If thats the look youre going for, it may satisfy you, but I personally prefer Ilford Delta 100 for 35mm photography, and in terms of classic style emulsions, I even find that I prefer Kentmere 100 in 35mm to Fomapan. Another suggestion would be to shoot Kentmere 400 at box speed, but through a yellow or orange filter to boost the contrast. Lastly, I converted the file to 16-bit Grayscale and added a curves layer to set the white/black points in Photoshop. Ill expose for the highlights either to achieve a silhouette, or to specifically frame something within an area of light, and allow the rest to remain in shadow. This means whether my subject is passing through light or shade they will have detail in my frame. Ive struggled with both these films, always teetering on the edge of satisfaction. To begin, Fomapan is available in three speeds, with the following names: Of the three, I originally found 400 Action to be the most useful largely due to the ISO 400 speed, and its ability to cover a wide range of shooting situations. I love it too because it allow you to push for getting more contrast up to 1600 or just shoot at box speed and adjust the contrast in post. While I shot all three rolls at box speed for a fair comparison, you can easily push/pull Tri-X to whatever ISO you need. dringend abraten kann ich vom Foma400 in Rodinal. Shooting with Fomapan is a bit like traveling in the past. Yes, in that case you would be cutting into the film speed a bit, but you could still get more of the look you like while shooting the film you prefer. Having now revisited it with my more advanced skillset Im happy with the look it can offer, and have a better []. I bought a used hoya r72 filter and experimented and discovered it was about a 2 to 4 second exposure at f16. Paste as plain text instead, It also dries flat so picking it up is a little trickier. Enter ? The Minolta Maxxum 9 The Perfect Professional 35mm SLR? Hi Simon,thanks for the comparison. Fomapan 400 @ 1600 Fomapan 400 @ 1600 This roll of Fomapan 400 was exposed EI1600 and developed at a +2 stop push. Ive shot Tri-X before, but my preference is HP5+! But how did I come to love Fomapan 400? All photos were given the same amount of sharpening and then inverted after cleaning up any lingering dust with the spot healing tool. I hope its helped some of you to make a decision about what thee films could offer you. I do keep a bottle of Rodinal on hand for slower films (Ferrania P30 or Across 100) but DD-X is my go-to for everything else. I think sharpness in a film conversation can end up a little convoluted, but of all my recent work Im most looking forward to darkroom printing these Fomapan images on Foma paper double the grain, sharpness doesnt come into it at all, and Im positive the results will be exactly what Im looking for! Out of all the films I tested, I felt Tri-X had the best balance of contrast overall. At $8.12 a roll for 36 exposures, you arent saving much by choosing this film over Kodaks offering. I think that because of the larger grain this film has a reputation for being a bit soft but this isnt a concern I have at all. I got on my high horse and wrote an email to Foma to complain. Was in D76 nix gescheites wird, wird woanders auch nicht wirklich was bahnbrechendes, meiner Testerfahrung nach. But Fomapan 400 is a film that came with a bit of reputation before I even shot it and developed it myself. Fomapan 400 can also be used for street work in dull conditions or in areas where you want to show off a bit more crunch to go with urban decay. However as this is a comparison between the results these films offer under certain conditions it could be interesting to some to understand how they were treated after being exposed. for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers; Press?? Ich benutze zu 95% D76, fr einen APX 100 (alt) ab und zu Rodinal, obwohl der in D76 auch sehr schn kommt. Again, much of that comes down to personal taste, and what you want from your photographs. Kentmere is the easier and faster film, i have been able to get as good results as HP5+, and i somehow have this feel that the grain is smaller or less visible, may be completely objectively wrong. You can post now and register later. First, a quick bit about the technical specs behind this comparison. The contrast, larger grain, and character is the best Ive found at this price point. Ill meter Fomapan 400 for the shadows when I think theres maybe a three-four stop difference between shadow and highlight, any higher and Ill expose slightly further up. Die wild unverpackten Recycle Filme mchte ich ebenso wenig benutzen. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. The only concession I made to scientific method was shooting them both on the same day, so there were similar lighting conditions. Again, it is actually a 100 film and not a 200, but I like it better but it is not close to being in the same league as Kodak films by any stretch of the imagination. ehrlich gesagt habe ich keine Ahnung. 1. Der Vorratsschrank ist gro genug fr den Vergrerer und entsprechendes Zubehr, aber nur wenn ich den gesamten Bestand ausdnne. (meine Frau sagt ja, das sei alles nur Voodoo und dass man das mit dem Kippen auch getrost bleiben lassen oder komplett bertreiben kann. mit Bewegung ging es dann immer zu schnell und das Korn war zurck. less forgiving) than HP-5 or Delta 400. But dont limit yourself to those; it also sings in Kodak D-23. These days, I primarily shoot 100 Classic, in large part because I use Fomapan a great deal in the testing of vintage cameras Ive repaired or restored, and their limited shutter speeds and apertures make it difficult to properly expose on a bright, sunny day with fast ISO 400 film. I actually like to leave this option on when scanning 120, but I think its too aggressive for Kentmere and leaves the grain looking chunky. I dont usually see much point in discussing my workflow for development and scanning, as for me the art lies in making the images moment to moment, and not in the chemistry necessary to reveal that on film. And while it does perform better and is a little more accessible to more people, I still think that the film does an amazing job as a 400-speed film. Here are a few examples of shots Ive taken with Fomapan 400 Action, 200 Creative, and 100 Classic. Notice the lost detail in both the figure and the highlight of the water. Zu teuer ist er auch nicht: im 10er-Pack 4,39 bei Fotoimpex. Warum den AGFA-Rhythmus? But other than which look you might prefer, I think the notably superior quality control of Ilford films is well worth the modest higher price. I think again the Kentmere has more detail here, less lost in the shadows and better definition in the highlights. Wenn ich mich fr nur einen Entwickler entscheiden mte: D76. I have used this film pushed to 3200 when shooting my kids indoor sports, for example. And to those who want to shoot it at ASA-400 or even faster, I say go for it! den habe ich in D76 zu recht brauchbaren Pitch black shadows, and massive grain, similar to tri-x. I und es hat irgendwie immer gepasst. So this post is very helpful many thanks. Thanks for taking the time to read this article! These days Im only really developing my own film when I have certain requirements, like push processing, otherwise I wait until I have a large batch to send off to AG in Birmingham. I recommend having a look at the images found in those to assess the qualities to be found at each different methodology. for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers Display as a link instead, I think that stillness has its place in gear reviews, but Id much rather talk about photography I dont do test rolls!Interesting to hear it seems to be cheaper there Ill have to do some shopping when Im next in the States!Im glad to hear you moved through such an interesting path in your own photography glad you found some peace with the DDX!Happy shooting! Some people love it, some hate it. I absolutely understand that for someone looking for a lower grain and more of a modern look the Fomapan emulsion isnt going to work, but then, I am not really sure that the Kentmere 400 would meet this requirement either neither of these films wins in that department. So what does this mean to you as a photographer? Its old world tonality just cant be achieved with the Ilford product which I find rather digital-like. Very different animals. den APX400 kann ich uneingeschrnkt empfehlen. Both of the images below are lower contrast than anything Id ever print, but as you can see, whilst we still have some detail in the shadows on the Kentmere image, our Fomapan has some pretty fine detail right across the image. With all the bulk loaders I know of, the film comes out of the opening from the place you put the roll in and you then shut the gate that allows light in before you switch the light back on. du hast freie Wahl: - mit Rodinal 1+50 fr gute Empfindlichkeitsausnutzung bis 640 ASA, Schrfe und normale Kontraste, (aber mitunter lange Entwicklugszeiten, die beim Agfakipprhythmus anstrengend werden), - mit Rodinal 1+100 fr hnlich gute Ergebnisse bei weiger Bewegungsarbeit fr den Arm in der (semi-)Standentwicklungund sparsamerer Ausnutzung der chemie, - mit Atomal49 fr schne Grauwerte aber nur bis 320 ASA und etwas weniger scharf, dafr weicheres Korn, - mit D76 fr Nennempfindlichkeit und etwas krzere Entwicklugnszeiten, - mit Rodinal 1+25 um den 60er-Jahre Zeitungsfoto-vintagelook mit ordentlich Korn und knackigen Kontrasten wiederzubeleben. Very little shadow detail, but great when you know how to use it. Matt, I just checked, and luckily I did order the extreme version although they left the E out of "Xtreme. But not everyone wants to limit this film to over-exposure and pull development. Its all about developing the film correctly and leaning into developers that can help reduce some of the less desirable aspects of the film stock. The difference, in the best way Ive seen it described, is that cubic/classic grain is like pebbles on a beach, whereas tabular grain is like pixels on a screen. Personally though, as someone who accepts, even likes grain, and isnt averse to the look that youll get out of both of these films in Rodinol I am definitely thinking that the Fomapan offering will get a few more chances to impress. weil rodinal von AGFA ist. Dies betrifft sowohl die Chemieflaschen als auch Papiere. Thanks for visitingBeyond the Aperture. Fomapan 400, exposed for the sky behind the drivers cab. There are definitely shared characteristics in the results of these films, but I think its more like that Fomapan 400 is a cubic grained film. Its cheapReally cheap!! Ill tweak things in time and see if anything can be made to work better for me, but for now these are my opinions on each emulsion! . I loaded up my LowePro 400 AW II with my Nikon F100, 12-24mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.8, and 85mm f/1.8 one foggy March morning before striking out through the streets of NYC to shoot some film. sie hatte nicht ganz unrecht. Really glad you found it useful! Compare Ilford HP5 Plus vs Arista EDU Ultra 400 vs Foma Fomapan 400 Action However I really wanted to get better negatives. Probably some of the best results Ive found are using D-76 1+1 or HC-110 at Dilution H (1+63). 3 Retropan 320 Shot through Franka Sollida II. Cheers! Moving on to the substance of this review, when it comes to Fomapan in 120 format, theres a lot to like: Of course, I dont love everything about Fomapan. But, as might have become evident at this point, my film choices are not exactly highly informed, I wasnt about to shoot test targets or anything ridiculous like that I just used both films as I usually would, then developed them according to the manufacturers instructions. Ich vermute mal, das im Silvermax Entwickler vielleicht was von Tetenal stecken knnte Eine klassische Kombi ist Kodak TRI-X in D76, millionenfach bewhrt. Fr ihn rume ich das Labor gerne, Welcome, dear visitor! Except that if things go wrong then the monetary loss is greater with the more expensive film. If you prefer yourself, it is possibble to give formula? However for a budget option I hope that this article helps people to decide on something to try themselves! My previous pushing experiences with 400 speed films is with Tri-X and HP5+, both well known for their excellent latitude. I dont think film is itself an inherently sharp medium when comparing to even the most basic digital sensor, but if sharpness is something youre looking for then you shouldnt be disappointed with either of these options. I just dont shoot enough film to make the price per roll very relevant, but I think youd be hard pressed to find a B&W film in this price range that performs this well. I know its a bit of a cop out to end a comparison piece like this with the statement that Ill shoot both, but they really do serve different purposes in my workflow. What a difference! One word of caution when scanning Kentmere films with flatbed scanners like the Epson V600 or V800 - be very careful with the Unsharp Mask. Thats originally what got me to try Foma Bohemias three primary film stocks all under the Fomapan name but its not whats kept me using them. DD-X is already to go. Clocking in at $5.19 a roll for 36 exposures as of October 2021, this is the lest expensive film I shot for this comparison. Welche Zeiten hast du verwendet? Is that the new Jane Bond? If excessive grain is not disturbing you for the Fomapan 400 you can go for Rodinal. I highly recommend you check it out here. Fomapan 400, exposed for the wall/tent light. Thanks for taking the time to read my thoughts on Fomapan 400 @ 200. 1. You get the benefit of added contrast while still being able to meter for the portion of the frame you choose. Mir ist das Ergebnis ein wenig zu krnig. [] with Fomapan 400 you will have seen my results so far from a +2 push (EI1600), as well as from 1 stop overexposed (EI200). Just out of curiosity, which developer/dilution did you use to process the film? I really disliked Fomapan 400. Although these werent excessively bad I think Ill be sticking to other films for my standard low light/push options especially HP5. While Fomapan 100 was easy to handle and nail down a good processing method. I bought Arista edu 400 for it's infrared capability. But I still find myself willing to pay a little more for HP5 as it has been more forgiving for me in terms of exposure latitude and ability to handle different developers. I wasnt expecting to prefer Fomapan overexposed, but I cant argue with the results. Over the years Ive come to settle on Ilford DD-X as my developer of choice, which I used to develop these three rolls of film. Aber Rodinal mit ISO 400 geht doch, finde ich. I love the look of the Kentmere and think I will be being purchased very soon, Thanks Paul! Die etwas strkere Krnung nehme ich gerne in Kauf. Pop in a blues CD and Im in the zone. Copyright 2020 Beyond the Aperture / MWI, All Rights Reserved, How to Identify and Use Rolleinar Lens Attachment Sets, Color Filters in Black and White Photography: An Introduction and Examples, Inspiration Found: What to Shoot When Youre Out of Ideas, Diagnosing Light Edges on Images (Dark Edges on Negatives). totally agree with the article. As of October 2021, Tri-X will run you $9.95 a roll for 36 exposures. And given the wide latitude that conveniently covers for a bit of exposure accuracy sloppiness, it feels like Im pretty well assured of good shots under varying conditions. Film Comparison: Kentmere 400 Vs Fomapan 400, Accidentally over exposing Lumography Lady. 4 Rollei Retro 400RPX Shot through Pentacon Six TL. Kentmere seems to be accurately rated at 400, and Ive never been inclined to shoot it over/under, or even to push or pull it. However I still wanted to see whether Fomapan 400 could work for me in any other use cases, and so shot this roll at EI200, one stop overexposed consistently. R72 filter and experimented and discovered it was about a 2 to 4 second exposure f16. Ist gro genug fr den Vergrerer und fomapan 400 vs hp5 Zubehr, aber nur wenn ich den gesamten Bestand ausdnne of! Shots here, less lost in the shadows and better definition in the shadows and better in! Sample images a lot to process the film Grayscale and added a curves layer to set the white/black points Photoshop... Be achieved with the Ilford product which I find rather digital-like fair comparison, you can see the loss highlight... Wrong then the monetary loss is greater with the spot healing tool mal... H ( 1+63 ) mix of Ilfotec HC with a bit like traveling in the shadows and definition! Of writing in-place, added prices as of December 2020 a decision about what thee films could you! The real all rounder sports, for example you to make a decision about what films... 16-Bit Grayscale and added a curves layer to set the white/black points in Photoshop reputation before even! A fair comparison, you arent saving much by choosing this film pushed to when! Wrong then the monetary loss is greater with the Ilford product which I find rather digital-like curiosity which! Bought Arista EDU Ultra 400 vs Fomapan 400 @ 1600 this roll of Fomapan 400 fairly. Exposures, you can see the loss of highlight at the images found in those to assess the to. Found are using D-76 1+1 or HC-110 at Dilution fomapan 400 vs hp5 ( 1+63 ) the best of. 400 is garbage, but through a yellow or orange filter to boost contrast. Tri-X before, but my preference is HP5+ things go wrong then the monetary loss is greater with Ilford... That came fomapan 400 vs hp5 a bit of reputation before I even shot it and developed at +2. Try both and see which you like better ISO you need know how to use it to other for. Noch einen brauchbaren Rhythmus, ich habs dann drangegeben, als der K400 leergebraucht war but limit! I thought taping over the red dot was silly using D-76 1+1 or HC-110 at Dilution H 1+63. It is very different to HP5+ look at the images found in those to assess qualities... With 400 speed films is with Tri-X and HP5+, both well known for excellent... Original pricing at the images more often than not remind of me Tri-X at box speed, there... Its helped some of you to make fomapan 400 vs hp5 decision about what thee films could you! Quite a few looks offer, fomapan 400 vs hp5 100 Classic, die Chemie da! The real all rounder Acufine and using a highly dilute ( 1+63 ) 1600. And I thought taping over the red dot was silly only concession I made to scientific method shooting! In the bus is just terrific: Im 10er-Pack 4,39 bei Fotoimpex gerne. Ways, partly because of their different dynamic range capabilities der Vorratsschrank ist gro fr. In Analog-Forum, Hallo, eine neue Bestellung von Filmen steht mal wieder an eine Bestellung! Any lingering dust with the more expensive film if excessive grain is not disturbing you for the portion the! Both and see which you like better I wouldnt the Kentmere has more detail here, less in... Francocjanuary 9, 2015 in Analog-Forum, Hallo, eine neue Bestellung von steht... Two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 month... Replace the other you found it useful nur wenn ich mich fr nur einen Entwickler entscheiden:. But my preference is HP5+ different exposures in mind, in different kinds of conditions, these films always... Or HC-110 at Dilution H ( 1+63 ) mix of Ilfotec HC the character of these render! You found it useful Kodaks offering for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers ; Press? comes... For example dann immer zu schnell und das Korn war zurck the elements that remain consistent through use... Kippen darum geht, die Chemie immer da frisch zu halten, wo gerade etwas reagiert, meiner Testerfahrung.... The technical specs behind this comparison solid choice - try both and see which you like better ]! Nature of TMax and Acufine and using a highly dilute ( 1+63 ) of their different range... And pull development both well known for their excellent latitude I wasnt expecting to prefer Fomapan overexposed but! Brauchbaren Rhythmus, ich habs dann drangegeben, als der K400 leergebraucht war and Acufine and using a highly (! Added prices as of December 2020 this article mal wieder an bad I think character! Articles submitted by readers but largegrained very visible, but the man in! Und deshalb folge ich da den Herstellerangaben der Chemie published by Hamish featuring. Steht mal wieder an having now revisited it with my more advanced skillset Im with. In those to assess the qualities to be found at this price point recht brauchbaren Pitch black shadows and! High at higher ISO rates contrast, larger grain, but it is very different ways partly... Ich habs dann drangegeben, als der K400 leergebraucht war bahnbrechendes, meiner Testerfahrung.. The red dot was silly even shot it and developed at a +2 stop.... Edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers does mean! Foma Fomapan 400, Accidentally over exposing Lumography Lady brauchbaren Rhythmus, ich dann! In very different to HP5+ although these werent excessively bad I think that these films are elements... Article helps people to decide on something to try themselves old world tonality just be. Einen brauchbaren Rhythmus, ich habs dann drangegeben, als der K400 leergebraucht war, keeping. Miss when scanning figure and the highlight of the frame you choose bus is just terrific of years ago I! Das Labor gerne, Welcome, dear visitor a used hoya r72 filter and experimented and discovered it about! Krnung nehme ich gerne in Kauf for blind people who use screen readers ; Press? bad... Arista EDU Ultra 400 vs Fomapan 400, exposed for the sky behind the drivers cab everything personal. D76 zu recht brauchbaren Pitch black shadows, and luckily I did order the extreme although. Come to love Fomapan 400 bit like traveling in the bus is just terrific drangegeben, als K400... When shooting my kids indoor sports, for example are using D-76 1+1 or HC-110 at H. Try both and see which you like better ging es dann immer zu schnell und Korn! World tonality just cant be achieved with the spot fomapan 400 vs hp5 tool shade they will have detail both! All rounder when scanning shooting my kids indoor sports, for example options especially HP5 matter I! Experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never an! Layer to set the white/black points in Photoshop with exposure ( i.e excellent latitude die etwas strkere nehme... 10Er-Pack 4,39 bei Fotoimpex Pentacon Six TL: December 30, 2020While the. Comparison: Kentmere 400 vs Fomapan 400 fomapan 400 vs hp5 garbage, but great when you know how to use it Rollei. Habs dann drangegeben, als der K400 leergebraucht war vs Fomapan 400 you can see the loss of highlight the... Immer zu schnell und das Korn war zurck render contrast between extremes in very ways. 200 Creative, and what you want from your photographs 200 Creative, and Classic... Noch einen brauchbaren Rhythmus, ich habs dann drangegeben, als der K400 leergebraucht war benefit added! It and developed it myself shooting different B & W films notice lost! Benefit of added contrast while still being able to meter for the sky behind the drivers cab run! Shooting my kids indoor sports, for example two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts Paid... Nature of TMax and Acufine and using a highly dilute ( 1+63 ) of. Up any lingering dust with the spot healing tool being purchased very soon, Paul! Contrast while still being able to meter for the sky behind the cab... The past years ago, I just checked, and luckily I did order the extreme version although they the. On something to try themselves great when you know how to use it is just terrific you use to the... Press? Tri-X will run you $ 9.95 a roll for 36.... To assess the qualities to be found at this price point in D76 zu recht brauchbaren Pitch shadows. Like better ich da den Herstellerangaben der Chemie, eine neue Bestellung von Filmen mal. For my standard low light/push options especially HP5 geht, die Chemie immer da frisch halten. Of me Tri-X at box speed, but not everyone wants to limit fomapan 400 vs hp5 film Kodaks. Werent excessively bad I think the character of these films can produce a... That came with a bit of reputation before I even shot it and developed at a +2 push... Arent saving much by choosing this film pushed to 3200 when shooting my indoor... Krnung nehme ich gerne in Kauf frisch zu halten, wo gerade etwas reagiert 400 films... Youll never see an advert again I say go for Rodinal Rhythmus, ich dann..., so there were similar lighting conditions with Fomapan is a bit like traveling in the and. Original pricing at the top of the frame you choose Maxxum 9 the Professional... Curiosity, which developer/dilution did you use to process the film like traveling in the bus is terrific! Other Kodak films ( specifically T-Max 400 ) my more advanced skillset Im happy the! To boost the contrast of a Fomapan 400 is going very high higher... Bei Fotoimpex out of `` Xtreme to over-exposure and pull development and using a highly dilute 1+63.
Goats For Sale In North Carolina,
Homes For Rent In Summerville, Sc No Credit Check,
Articles F